I expected a lively discussion about alternatives for the class implementation, but nothing much happened. Does this mean that most people agree with making this changed:
1. Make object members public by default. They can be read and written from anywhere. 2. The only other possibility is making the object members private. This is done with the existing mechnism to prefix an underscore to the name. This simplifies things, there is no "read-only" access mode, which is currently the default. There is no need for a "plublic" keyword. This is a bit limited, but it's simple. And making things simple is part of the goals for the Vim9 script syntax. Unless there are relevant objections, I'll make this change. -- Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// \\\ \\\ sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/20230123125350.D80E31C0548%40moolenaar.net.
