* Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> [230314 13:24]: > > Ernie Rael wrote: > > > I sometimes want "collection->foreach((_, v) => ...v...)", a simple > > one liner, no return or return ignored. I know it's not a performance > > winner, or I'd want it more. > > > > After a quick look at the code, it looks like simply introducing > > another filtermap_T, FILTERMAP_FOREACH, and there's not much coding > > needed (I only looked at list). Probably more work doing tests/doc. > > > > Any objections or other considerations? > > So, this would iterate over the items in a List or Dictionary and invoke > a function for each one. I assume the List or Dictionary is not > modified, otherwise you would use map(). Thus it's a short version of a > for loop. This seems useful. > > I would suggest first writing the help and think of any error conditions > that need to be handled. Perhaps the collection should be locked > (frozen) to avoid trouble?
Would this have any functionality that is not provided by using mapnew and ignoring or throwing away the result? ...Marvin -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/ZBDOze8DACtOID%2Bj%40basil.wdw.
