Hi Doug, On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 7:14 AM Doug Kearns <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 23:50, Yegappan Lakshmanan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> From the email thread >> https://groups.google.com/g/vim_dev/c/yYpFNUHdRho/m/xjgrKqMoBQAJ?pli=1 >> and the following items in the todo.txt file: >> >> - Change access: public by default, private by prefixing "_". >> Check for error: can't have the same name twice (ignoring "_" >> prefix). >> >> This is not yet implemented. We cannot change this after releasing Vim 9.1. >> Should we make this change now? > > > I expect this will be an unpopular opinion but I'd strongly consider > releasing 9.1 > without significant changes to Vim9 script from the 9.0 release. Then the > object model > could be released with Vim 10. >
Once Vim 9.1 is released, we cannot break backward compatibility. This means that we cannot change the current accessibility of the object/class members and methods. Regards, Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7%3Drb-w_p8Bq5wjtS5srpsYiazexA94C8a_E5G_bO5PrPw%40mail.gmail.com.
