On Di, 12 Dez 2023, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Something has gone wrong again. > > Remember: tags v9.0.2140 to v9.0.2142 had gone missing, but tags > v9.0.2143 to v9.0.2155 had been set correctly. Well, now tags > v9.0.2156 to v9.0.2158 have gone missing again. > > This concerns only the Mercurial .hgtags metadata (and I don't know > about any git metadata). In all cases the src/version.c contains the > full list of patch numbers. Fixed. Not sure why this happened, the script did not receive a tag when processing the git revision. This could happen, if I push out a new patch, then the hg-bridge runs and a few moments later the tag is pushed. However, this shouldn't happen 3 times in a row, so it's a bit mysterious. I added some extra logic to parse the subject line in addition when this happens again. Thanks, Christian -- Avoid contact with eyes. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/ZXgOx%2Bjv9/IzDb11%40256bit.org.
