Hi Andy!

Not to worry, my question was not sarcasm. I joined vim_mac a few days  
ago, and was genuinely interested in both the theory of top/bottom  
responding AND the local custom.

Reading your explanation, I realised that I am myself more of a bottom  
poster, but that in certain occasions - when the thread contains only  
one main self-contained point - I naturally switch to top posting, ..  
as you can see.

Anyway, I realise this is a bit off topic, so I'll stop here. I am in  
favour of reminders if necessary, and I would find it useful if  
newcomers were sent a description of the so-called local custom upon  
joining the group. Maybe post it online somewhere? Is there a website  
for the list?

Thank you for your response!

~Etienne


Le 3 sept. 09 à 01:40, Andy Michaels a écrit :

>
>> This is all very interesting, but as I am new on the list, I am not
>> sure what you mean by top/bottom posting. Can I ask for a quick
>> explanation? Thanks much!
>>
>> ~e
>
> Hi Etienne...
>
> Assuming your message wasn't sarcasm, top posting refers to replying
> to a message with your response on top:
>
>
> Your response
>
>>> original message
>
>
> Bottom posting is the opposite:
>
>
>>> original message
>
> Your response.
>
>
> Or, as you'll sometimes see, bottom posters put their response inline
> with the original post:
>
>
>>> original post point 1
>
> Your response 1
>
>>> original post point 2
>
> Your response 2
>
> etc.
>
> In very long threads, the thread is much more easily read if bottom
> posting is followed, because you read the thread from top to bottom,
> rather than from bottom up,
>
> Hope that helps!  If your response was sarcasm, then please ignore  
> this message!
>
> -Andy
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to