On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, René Köcher wrote:

> Dragging apps into the application folder is how it's always been on 
> mac - easy.  In my opinion it's the best way to install MacVim.

Agreed.  Mac apps shouldn't use installers unless they have considerably 
complicated installations, like installing kernel extensions and other 
bits all over the filesystem.  Installers (vs. a plain "drag this to 
somewhere" app) tend to evoke distrust, and sometimes even ire, from 
some (particularly old-school) Mac users.

> Regarding the optional mvim script - why not take the same approach 
> as Textmate did?
> In Textmate you have a click able help entry to install optional 
> components like mate (the mvim for Textmate) or "Edit in Textmate".
>
> MacVim could bundle the mvim script right in it's application bundle 
> and provide a simple command or script to create the needed symlinks.

A menu choice somewhere in MacVim for "install mvim command-line script" 
would be helpful, but it could be even simpler...

On startup, MacVim already reads (and occasionally updates) some (Mac) 
preferences (out of ~/Library/Preferences/org.vim.MacVim.plist), right?

So store a "last version/build run" field, check it when MacVim starts 
up, if the current version number differs from the last (or if there's 
no last version, because this is a first time install), then check the 
directories in $PATH for mvim.  If it isn't found (or if it is, but the 
contents compare as different to the one stored in MacVim's Resources), 
pop up a dialog box over the initial Vim window, offering to install 
mvim.  It doesn't even need to be complicated with a file chooser.  If 
/usr/local/bin is on the users $PATH, offer to install it there, else 
if $HOME/bin is on the path, offer that, otherwise make it a simple 
informational alert box that explains there's this optional script 
called mvim that the user could install if they felt inclined to do 
so (along with "see :h mvim-install for details").

Chances are, anyone who would be interested in using mvim already has 
put /usr/local/bin, or ~/bin, on their path, and the dialog only 
appears once for each new version of MacVim installed (and actually not 
even that -- because of the heavy overlap between "MacVim users" and 
"Terminal users", a very common case will be that you already have 
mvim on your path and the contents are the same as new MacVim's 
version of mvim, so you'd only get the dialog in the rare case of 
starting a new version of MacVim that also has an updated version 
of mvim).

Then, if you want to complete the "look like other apps" install 
experience, put MacVim.app in a .dmg file along with a Mac alias to 
/Applications, and a background image for the folder that gives simple 
instructions, like this (apologies to those not reading with fixed-width 
fonts):
        "Drag this..."  "...to here"
        [ MacVim.app ]  [ /Applications alias ]

This also effectively answers the "what's the right way to install" 
question, because the user would be led through it.

Several apps get around the "some users end up running the app straight 
out of the dmg" problem by checking their location when they start up; 
if they're under /Volumes, they offer to copy themselves into the 
/Applications folder.  Alternatively, since MacVim.app could be the 
only thing in the container (.dmg, .zip, .tgz), especially if any 
necessary "readme" info is presented in an initial (one-time) "Welcome 
to MacVim" alert, you could package MacVim.app as the only contents of 
a .zip (or .tgz, but .zip might look more familiar to most) -- the user 
downloads it, double-clicks MacVim###.zip, and ends up with MacVim.app, 
figure they can run it right there, or move it to /Applications or 
/Other/App/Folder as they see fit (one could also offer to move oneself 
to /Applications if one finds oneself running from ~/Downloads -- you 
could wrap that with a "last version run from downloads" value in the 
preferences, to keep from continually annoying the one odd user out 
there who wants to keep/run apps in ~/Downloads).

I know these suggestions would carry more weight if I offered patches 
instead of instructions; alas, no time right now, perhaps in the near 
future (programming comes naturally, but I'm rusty on Mac coding, and 
haven't poked around inside MacVim's code before, though I've been a 
*very* happy user/recommender of MacVim for a couple years).

> +1 D&D app-bundle

+2 :)

Cheers,
-- Carl

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Reply via email to