On Jul 22, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Tony Berkopes wrote: > As the wc.vim script states it is 'Strunk & White' compliant as to the EXACT > number of words in a manuscript or other documents that must have an exact > count. There IS a difference to the word count between the wc.vim and the > other examples. I also have not determined which of the 2 is faster. Any > comments from other readers is WELCOME!! > > If you have read the code in wc.vim, I commented out the part that counts > until a series of '--------' 8 dashes is found. I don't want/need that and it > probably slows it down for no reason. > > Just copy/paste the example in a previous post into your .vimrc and add the > example to your status line.
Thanks, Tony. A little unclear what you're suggesting, though. When you speak of commenting out lines in wc.vim, it sounds like you're proposing retention of it for word count functionality. When you speak of copying and pasting "the example in a previous post" into my .vimrc, it sounds like you're recommending replacing wc.vim with your script. Or are you suggesting putting the wc.vim code in my .vimrc and incorporating the code for getting the count into the status line into it? Is your script Strunk and White compliant? Also, what is the command to run it? Regards, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
