Yeah. It's awkward to incorporate folding into that. Syntax folding
works well when there are regions, e.g. if you included both the {{{ and
the }}} parts.
The foldexpr option is a better way to go in this case, I think. I'm not
sure the one contributed was quite right, though. Perhaps
set foldmethod=expr
set foldexpr=MyFoldLevel(v:lnum)
func! MyFoldLevel(l)
let len=strlen(matchstr(getline(a:l),'^-*'))
if len==0
return '='
else
return len
endif
endfunc
Completely untested.
Ben.
> My syntax file looks like the following
>
> syntax match Lev1 /^- .*{{{1/
> syntax match Lev2 /^-- .*{{{2/ etc
>> To fold based on that definition, you can use
>>
>> :set foldmethod=expr
>> :set foldexpr=strlen(matchstr(getline(v:lnum),'^-*'))
>>
>> Without knowing the contents of your syntax file, it's a bit hard
>> to determine how a foldmethod=syntax verions might be folded (pun
>> intended) into your syntax highlighting specification.
>>
>> -tim
>>> - level 1
>>> -- level 2
>>> --- level 3, etc
>>>
>>> Can use syntax folding instead since I already have a syntax file
>>> setup for highlighting? And how would I do that?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
