Anton Sharonov wrote: > I think this patch is worst to be listed on the vim patches > page... So we have more chances it will be tested and > somebody vote for it. > Second good example: cygwin clipboard patch [1]. > > [1] Frodak Baksik patch "vim on cygwin using win32 clipboard" > http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/msg/135c057dcef64a11
There is a list of unofficial patches for Vim at: http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/web/vim-patches If anyone would like a patch added to that list (or would like a change to existing text), please post the proposed text. I'm happy to edit the page, but I don't want to take the time to work out what the patch is about in order to devise a suitable description. Information needed is: Title of patch Author Status (alpha/beta/any text to describe reliability) Site (URL of site with patch) Description (a short description of what the patch achieves) I can't miss this opportunity to whine a little more: It would be much better if we put this page on the wiki! Editing a Google web page can be a PITA. John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
