On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:45, Markus Heidelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Hartmann, 16.11.2008: >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 20:36, Markus Heidelberg >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > However, we would only want the file(s) with the modified-by defined to use >> > this "union" merge driver and there only the line(s) with this content. But >> > after looking into the Makefile, the simle "union" driver is not what we >> > want. >> > It doesn't help us to have multiple >> > CONF_ARGS = --with-modified-by="feature 1" >> > CONF_ARGS = --with-modified-by="feature 2" >> > among each other. We had to combine it to >> > CONF_ARGS = --with-modified-by="feature 1, feature 2" >> >> You can simply concat the strings into WITH_MODIFIED_BY and then >> feed that variable into CONF_ARGS. > > Of course, but I don't want to force any habits for the master branch into the > patch branches. Someone only looking at a patch wonders why there is a new > variable WITH_MODIFIED_BY += "feature 1". I think you mean this syntax.
Bram, would you be OK with a change which facilitates this? It would not be noticable to the general users (or pretty much anybody, for that matter), would not affect the compiled binaries in any way and it might help to track any problems from patched Vim versions in the future. RIchard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
