On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:16:17 +0100 Andy Wokula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michal Kurgan schrieb: > > Hello! > > > > I've found strange behaviour in vim. > > maybe it's rather caused by your strange setup? > > > When doing "autocmd VimEnter * nested badd ..." syntax highlight work as > > expected, means i see colors. I can use "bnext" and see colors in all > > badd'ed files. > > didn't check the above, but expected to work > It turns that i have to experiment more to find what is the problem, see below. > > However if i do "autocmd VimEnter * nested source ..." and inside the > > file i use badd, then there are no colors in buffers unless i run > > "edit ..." (this can be done in the sourced file). When using bnext i > > don't see colors (i.e. "syntax" returns "No Syntax items defined for this > > buffer). > > works here, without problems: > > [ ... ] I found that the culprit was bufdo command that i used in sourced file right after series of badd calls... It's is even written that Syntax is disabled there, thus it enumerates buffers and disables colors. What is strange, colors are there when buffers are opened with "edit" before the bufdo. In my case moving bufdo before badd calls or adding "edit's" solved problem. Now, if *this* bufdo behaviour is normal... -- Michal Kurgan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
