On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:14 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If someone could provide a small (but useful) Tex program and indicate
>> which tags should be identified, and the rules by which to identify
>> it, I could consider how much work it would be to add it.
> TeX is not a programming language.
> You can consider about it like HTML (but it is very brutally
> comparison).
> Here you can find an example LaTeX file:
> http://sip.clarku.edu/tutorials/TeX/intro.html
>
>> If I recall on this list, there is other talk about ReTex (or something).
>> Is there different dialects of Tex?
> TeX is a generic language.
> There are some extensions of it.
> The most popular (and common) is LaTeX.
> Furthermore bibtex and tetex.
>
> It will be excellent if Exuberant Tags will parse at least following
> tags:
> subsubsection
> subsection
> section
> chapter
If you can build ctags from source I have checked in a tex parser.
Looks for files with .tex extension.
Produces 5 types of tags:
c,chapter
s,section
u,subsection
b,subsubsection
p,package
It is a token parser which can handle tags of this format:
\keyword{any number of words}
\keyword[short desc]{any number of words}
\keyword*[short desc]{any number of words}
\keyword[short desc]*{any number of words}
Will find tags for the following lines:
\usepackage{amsmath}
\chapter{chapter text}
\section{section1 text}
\subsection{subsection2}
\subsubsection{subsubsection3 with extra text}
If someone that actually uses Tex can give it a go you can email me
directly with any issues.
Dave
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
