> By "keymap" you mean a mapping, don't you? It's clear from the context this is no keymap in the vim sense of the word. But you're right that I should care more about vim terminology.
> The mapping you show (and where I know my mailer probably misquoted the > spaces next to <> signs) includes two instances of the ":setl[ocal]" > command, none of the ":set" command. Hm? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
