On 22/02/09 16:14, Charles E. Campbell, Jr. wrote:
[...]
> * Authorship can convey a notion of reliability (or lack thereof). An
> article by Tony M would, for example, probably be considered more
> trustworthy (authoritative :)) than one from (*-* NOTICE: THE NETPOLICE
> HAVE CENSORED SOME INFORMATION AT THIS POINT *-*).
[...]
Thanks. :-) May I return the compliment? When I come across a tip by Dr.
Chip, I read it with much more attention than if it were by just any
Tom, Dick, Harry, John Doe, or John Q. Public. (Any names after "more
attention than" are purely fictitious; any resemblance of any of them
with reality can only exist in the reader's imagination ;-) ).
Best regards,
Tony.
--
A continuing flow of paper is sufficient to continue the flow of paper.
-- Dyer
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
