> pretty nice thing, but not exactly what I wanted. still no autocompletion.
So, what DO you want? We can't help you if you don't say exactly the behavior you want. Vim can probably do it. > > > Have you tried omnicompletion? See |i_CTRL-X_CTRL-O| (Vim 7 only). > > yes I did and imho it sucks even against c-n. Instead of saying "it sucks" how about saying what you want it to do, but it doesn't do? Why isn't this usuable for you? There are many ways to customize this behavior, many plugins that customize/improve it for certain situations/usage patterns,and if all else fails you can write your own. Again, tell us what you want, and there may be a solution for you. Don't just whine at us. > > > See above. Even when the filetype-plugin doesn't define an autocomplete > > function, you can use "syntax completion", by dropping the attached > > script into ~/.vim/after/plugin (on Unix/Linux) or > > ~/vimfiles/after/plugin (on Windows). (Warning: That plugin assumes, and > > doesn't check, that you are in 'nocompatible' mode. If you aren't, or > > not always, remove all continuation lines [lines whose first nonblank is > > a backslash] by joining them to the previous line.) > > it doesn't work for me. Why not? What does it do that you don't expect it to do? What does it not do that you do expect it to do? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
