On Mar 29, 6:22 am, "John Beckett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I suppose some people come here, don't read much, post a
> question and read only the replies to their question.
>
That is my assumption. For this reason, and to reduce some of the
fluff on the list, I've actually started responding directly to the
offending party (though you've beat me to this one).
I've actually had someone email me back, saying that it was not
possible for him to configure his mobile device to bottom-post (the
replied-to text gets added server-side), and wondering whether he
should just avoid posting unless he was on a easier-to-configure
device.
I personally would much rather see a poorly formatted but interesting
question than none at all, but without a good reason such as this one,
it is certainly very annoying to readers of the list when people seem
to constantly ignore our promptings.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
