> Well, I should have said "half deterministic gqap". This
> command reflows a paragraph, and in certain circumstances if
> you apply it repeteadly on some paragraphs, the layout is
> different.
I can't say that I've noticed a problem with "gqap" and
determinism -- and I use it quite it regularly.
One other possibility that occurs to me for your investigation:
does your unflowed paragraph have a character that would be
treated as a mail/quote/comment-leader. So if you had something like
you see this is > that which is >some other
and it reflows to look like
you see this is
> that which is
>some other
reflows might change their behavior on the next reformat. It's a
bit of a pessimal test-case, but something you can watch for.
That said, just because I haven't reproduced it in years of usage
doesn't mean there's not some confluence of options that causes
problems. :)
It might help to include your settings from
set formatexpr? formatprg? textwidth? formatoptions?
And if you notice it happen again, undo your "gqap"s, yank the
original paragraph, intermediate paragraph, and final results
into an email with the output of the above settings. That may
better allow folks to reproduce the issue.
-tim
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
