On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:30 AM, pansz wrote:
>
> Tony Mechelynck 写道:
>>> Remember, as long as "cp1250" is *before* latin1 in fencs, it is like
>>> latin1 is not even there, since cp1250 will always succeed.
>>
>> Exactly, so it's better to have at most one 8-bit encoding in
>> 'fileencodings' (plural), and only in the last position, because
>> anything after the first 8-bit encoding will never even be tried.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> cp936 is a 16-bit encoding, I've been told that cp936 will always
> succeed and it make no sense adding anything in 'fencs' beyond cp936,
> but that's not true, since vim will recognize invalid characters and try
> things beyond cp936. (e.g. put gb18030 after cp936 works for my gb18030
> file)
>
> For 8-bit encodings I'm not sure, but it may happen that some characters
> are invalid for some particular 8-bit encoding so having more than one
> 8-bit encoding may be useful.
To quote the help:
An entry for an 8-bit encoding (e.g., "latin1") should be the last,
because Vim cannot detect an error, thus the encoding is always
accepted.
~Matt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
