Peter wrote:
> I see, my proposal looks ackward since the {tagadress} field is
> actually an Ex command. Still I'm not sure that having ex command
> there is better than having line nubmer there and get the tag
> locations updated as file is edited. This may result in wrong
> locations, but having there some search expressions is not much better
> since there is no usable way to fit language syntax and scoping rules
> to the search expressions.
>
I see that the ubiquitous exuberant ctags doesn't directly support
Haskell (ctags ----list-languages). Here's some ideas.
* if the tagged items can be picked up by regular expressions, then
ctags could be extended to handle Haskell.
* as you've written, you could modify ghci. that probably isn't easy.
* you could write a post-processor; ie. read the ghci-generated tag file
and the associated source code file(s), substituting a search for the
lines' text in place of the line number and generate a New&Improved tags
file.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
