On Sep 4, 7:05 pm, Hari Krishna Dara <[email protected]> wrote:
> I checked out the source for the current vim from svn, and the
> 2html.vim from there still doesn't have that line. My guess is that
> you are taking diff against a custom 2html.vim (which you named as
> tohtml.vim) that has more than what 2html.vim has.
>

Nope, I always used the latest version for FTP for the patches.

What version of the patch are you looking at? I can't find the word
"runtime" at all in the latest patch submitted on the thread.

But, apparently the latest version of the syntax/2html.vim already
contains the patch, so this is a moot point now.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to