On Sep 4, 7:05 pm, Hari Krishna Dara <[email protected]> wrote: > I checked out the source for the current vim from svn, and the > 2html.vim from there still doesn't have that line. My guess is that > you are taking diff against a custom 2html.vim (which you named as > tohtml.vim) that has more than what 2html.vim has. > Nope, I always used the latest version for FTP for the patches. What version of the patch are you looking at? I can't find the word "runtime" at all in the latest patch submitted on the thread. But, apparently the latest version of the syntax/2html.vim already contains the patch, so this is a moot point now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: vimdiff export to html Markus Heidelberg
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ben Fritz
- Re: vimdiff export to html Steve Hall
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ben Fritz
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Hari Krishna Dara
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Hari Krishna Dara
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ben Fritz
- Re: vimdiff export to html Hari Krishna Dara
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ben Fritz
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ben Fritz
- Re: vimdiff export to html Ricky
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Tony Mechelynck
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Hari Krishna Dara
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
- Re: vimdiff export to html Christian Brabandt
