Tim Chase wrote: >> Add the n flag: :%s/.../.../n > > That was my first thought too, but it looks like the > replacement portion isn't evaluated if you use the /n flag.
Ahh ... now that you point it out, it's a bit obvious that evaluating the replacement should be pointless when using 'n'. John -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
