* 2010-03-29 21:01 (+0100), Antony Scriven wrote:
> On 28 March 2010 09:25, Teemu Likonen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> DISCLAIMER: My tests may suck so I suggest everyone do better ones.
>> :-)
>
> :-). Well I think I should mention that GForth is VM based, or it was
> last I looked.
More accurately GForth uses GCC to compile direct or indirect threaded
code.
> A fast commercial Forth is probably pretty close to the optimised
> SBCL.
Yes, that's very likely. Here's an old comparison between Forth systems:
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/performance.html
GForth seems to be the fastest of those which do not produce pure native
code.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
vim_use+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words
"REMOVE ME" as the subject.
