I've tried setting all of the following evs to 1, but it didn't help. java_allow_cpp_keywords java_highlight_all java_highlight_java_lang_ids
I also diff'd the three syntax/java.vim files from my mac with the one on my ubuntu machine, but they are all exactly the same. /Applications/Contents/Resources/vim/runtime/syntax/java.vim /Applications/MacVim.app/Contents/Resources/vim/runtime/syntax/ java.vim /usr/share/vim/vim72/syntax/java.vim I might try diff'ing all the syntax files and get back to you On Apr 1, 5:10 pm, "Benjamin R. Haskell" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, chardson wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out why there's a discrepancy between syntax > > highlighting between my two setups: > > > · OS 10.6, MacVim 7.2 stable 1.2 > > · Ubuntu 9.04, Vim 7.2.079 > > > A while ago I moved my .bashrc, .vimrc, and .vim/ to a git repository > > shared on both machines. They are both at the same version and I've > > ensured that none of the files are missing from the repository. > > See the recent vim_use thread about Java syntax highlighting: > > Why is "template" highlighted in Java code > > (OT: Maybe you didn't find it because you topeka'ed it on AltaVista?) > > If I'm not mistaken (big 'if' on this one), Ubuntu uses Debian for its > upstream sources, and it sounds like there was a Debian packaging error > that caused an odd version of syntax/java.vim to be included. > > Workaround for that problem would be to explicitly add: > > let java_allow_cpp_keywords=1 > (or 0, according to preference) > > (Though I thought the issue would only affect C++ keywords... > Maybe there are other differences in the mispackaged version?) > > -- > Best, > Ben -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
