Это конечно хорошо, но нафига это нужно. или пропатчить бету официально так трудно?
On Jun 10, 7:29 am, Sergey Khorev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:28 PM, George V. Reilly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I tried building Vim with Ruby 1.9 on Windows a few weeks ago. Unlike > > Ruby 1.8, it simply wasn't possible with the MSVC compiler, because > > 1.9 came with include files and libs for MinGW only. > > Vim can be built with either MSVC or MinGW, but the official Windows > > builds have always been built with MSVC. > > It'd certainly be nice to have Ruby 1.9 be the default. > > I believe build onhttp://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/requires > MSVC 6.0 > (ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org//pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/ruby-1.9.1-p376-i3...). -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
