Hi. After playing wit different ways of completion in vim coding Python I found that a mix of several methods seems to be the best option. I found that using dictionaries is more reliable than omni completion, because some of the modules I am using don´t laod properly from vim, you don´t have completion of keywords and is slower. So I found the Pydiction plugin: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=850 Which is nice, but the problem is that when you have an instance of a class it cannot be found in the dictionary. For instance: p = re.compile('[a-z]+') print (p.match("hola")) Well, when you type "p" in the print statement you get "no match" because using Pydiction you set iskeyword to include . and ( with the next statement: setlocal iskeyword +=.,( In the dictionary you have re.match( rather than p.match(). So in this situations is better to go back to the standar complete looking inthe current and used buffers o look for the word match. Basically what I want to do is to make a complete using dictionaries and with iskeyword +=.,( And if this search don´t get nothing then complete using the usual <C-N> or <C-P>, but with the standar iskeyword, ,which doesn´t include . or ( I want to do this with just one keymap. This way i will get a more reliable completion method, and I dont need to do first a dictionary search, and then, if needed, a regular complete.
Is it possible? Thanks -- Un saludo Best Regards Pablo Giménez -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
