On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 08:31:02AM EST, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > Tim Chase <v...@tim.thechases.com> wrote on Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:24:01AM > -0600: > >On 02/20/2011 07:12 AM, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> >>> :h 'linebreak' and > >>> :h 'breakat' > >> With the correct key words (now), I found > >> http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Word_wrap_without_line_breaks > >> Which essentially works, but I thought one could then threat the lines > >> as logical lines with<j> and<k>. > > I've seen many folks remap "j" and "k" (or <up> and <down>) to their > > screen-line motions "gj" and "gk" which will move as you expect. > > That leaves the other pair (if you remap j/k then up/down, or > > vice-versa) for traversing physical lines. > > > > :nnoremap <down> gj > > :nnoremap <up> gk > That's great, many thanks! Since in my case flowed long lines are the exception, I use the following mapping: :map <Esc>j gj :map <Esc>k gk (¹) If I have a long line that spans half a dozen or more screen lines for instance, I find it a lot easier to depress the left Alt key with my left thumb and hit j/k repeatedly (or even keep them depressed) to move around than using the standard ‘gq’ and ‘gq’. It's also more mnemonic where I'm concerned.. I never manage to remember gj/gk.. ;-) cj ¹ The mapping I use in XTerm+GNU/screen+Vim.. Not sure about other environments. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
