Lately I've been using the Ex commands :d, :t, :m to shuffle text around while editing. Since the syntax of those commands require the source *and* destination lines, e.g.:
:100copy150 to copy line 100 below line 150, I wonder why my cursors is *moved* to line 150 after the command. I tend to use those Ex commands precisely to avoid having to navigate to the line I want to move. But then I end up having to navigate back to where I was before I entered the command. It's a small annoyance, really, no big deal but I was wondering if others had thoughts on this behavior. Is there a use of them where that behavior makes more sense than leaving the cursor where it is? Is there a way I may have overlooked to change that behavior? -- JR -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php