On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:08:24 AM UTC+2, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > > >> The thing is that making gvim more modern wouldn't take away any of > >> that. You still have the option of using vim (i.e. in a terminal) > > This seems the wrong stance to me. Changing the look of Gvim shouldn't > affect its functionality. While I generally use vim (not gvim), I've > considered switching, just for the undercurl decoration. The reason > it'd be easy to switch is pretty straightforward: GVim still behaves > (AFAICT) exactly the same as console vim. Only the appearance is > different. > I didn't express myself clearly enough. Please read my reply to Tony where I tried to be more clear about what I meant.
-- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
