On 2011-07-29, Sigma wrote: > On Jul 29, 7:10 pm, sc wrote: > > On Friday, July 29, 2011 11:19:34 Steve Sullivan wrote: > > > (i've since stopped using netrw, but the > > principle applies)
> There's a replacement for netrw? Great!What? How? > When I build vim 7.3 from source, netrw is built in. > It's not even an option. When I type :e . > up comes netrw. I'd be glad for a better replacement! NERD_tree http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658 A lot of people seem to think it's a lot better than netrw. I tried it for a while but personally didn't like it as well as netrw, so I went back to using netrw. For me, netrw "just works" without having to think about it. YMMV. Regards, Gary -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
