Reply to message «Re: sh vs bash syntax coloring», sent 18:28:38 01 August 2011, Monday by Leiking:
> zsh. ? Original message: > zsh. > > 2011/8/1 <[email protected]>: > >> You can put this option somewher in ~/.zshenv. Or, better, use zsh > >> syntax for it: > >> !action=(xpdf -option) ; ... ; $action file > >> !action="xpdf -option" ; ... ; ${(z)action} file > >> !action="xpdf -option" ; ... ; $=action file > >> in last case it is just one more character to type, in the first case > >> you should type exactly the same number of characters, but two of them > >> are different. These methods are not the same under all circumstances, > >> but are the same here. I actually hate using bash for scripting: how do > >> you like using command "${array[@]}" > >> where in zsh you type just > >> command $array > >> . You have to also turn your mind on remembering that you must use > >> quotes around any parameter if you want it to come in one piece and > >> unmodified. > >> > >> I would likely choose zsh, perl, python for scripting but not bash. > > > > Ok thank you. I think this will be sufficient for my need. > > Actually I didn't say bash was better than zsh, but I learnt sh syntax > > first (not even bash, so no array at all it seems) and I don't know zsh > > one. I only write small scripts ;-) > > But I'm sure you're right. > > > > -- > > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
