On 2011-08-10, Linda W wrote:
> When I have the construct, in 4.1:
>
>
> 1 #!/bin/bash
> 2
> 30
> 31 # trace control for subs
> 32 declare -ix Allow_Trace=$(((
> 33 _D_LowLevel |
> 34 _D_Provides |
> 35 _D_
> 36 )))
> 37
> 38 declare -ix Trace_off=$(((
> 39 _D_
> 40 )))
> 41
> 42 # for setting a local '_Debug' flag in a routine
> 43 declare -ix Debug=$(((
> 44 _D_
> 45 )))
> 46
> 47
> 907 # vim: ts=2 sw=2 fdm=marker nofen
>
>
>
> The syntax highligher doesn't like my ) brace.
That's a parenthesis. A brace is one of these thingies: }.
> If I put a space after $( and before th final ), then the error goes
> away, but it changes
> the semantics of the statment (one does an arith cal, and reurns value,
> but with spaces,
> it does the arith and returns the status of the of wheither or not the
> 'calc' returned 0 (fail)
> or 1(pass).
>
> For hosethat want to complain about HTML, bing used on vim llist -- -
> just ignore the post..
Your message arrived in my inbox as pure text/plain--no HTML
anywhere in it.
> Is this fixable???
Yes, depending on what you think is "fixed".
With the $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/sh.vim that comes with vim 7.3.189, I
see the error. With a newer syntax/sh.vim, however, I see different
highlighting and no error. I don't remember if this syntax/sh.vim
was posted to the vim_use or vim_dev list or if it was posted as a
script to vim.sf.net. The header is
" Vim syntax file
" Language: POSIX-compliant shell script
" Maintainer: Radek Nadstawny <[email protected]>
" Last Change: 2011 May 25
With the new syntax file, the outer two sets of parentheses are
highlighted as shExpansion and the inner set is highlighted as
shArithmeticOperator.
Regards,
Gary
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
