On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 12, 2011, at 5:34 AM, Stefan Otte wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote: >>> >>>> I just released vim-orgmode 0.3 an Orgmode clone for vim >>>> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3642. >>> >>> How is this related to this < >>> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3342 >? I take it not at >>> all, other than that you're both trying to do/doing the same thing. >> >> They are not related at all. >> >> VimOrganizer has more features. vim-orgmode is gaining some ground >> though. The code of vim-orgmode is better organized (I think) and it's >> mostly implemented in python. > > Thanks, Stefan. I have no experience with the original, but I've heard a lot > about it. How do they compare with it?
OrgMode is huge. It has a lot of features and quite a few fans. Take a look for yourself: http://orgmode.org/ There are also youtube videos that give you an overview aboud it. At some point I thought about switching to emacs because of orgmode...but I simply had do many ':w' in my documents :) Anyway, vim-orgmode still has a long way to go to be on par with orgmode...but it's quite usable and it replaced vim-wiki for me. Take a look for yourself (and give some feedback). I hope you'll enjoy it! Best, Stefan > > Regards, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA USA > [email protected] > > > > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
