The fonts are beautiful. I have tried the fonts in terminal vim
and gvim. Both work for me.
On Oct 10, 5:07 am, "George V. Reilly" <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Reflowed as a bottom post to forestall whining from the usual suspects]
>
> 2011/10/9 Александр Куринный <[email protected]>
>
> > On 9 October 2011 00:12, George V. Reilly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Since monospaced fonts are a perennial topic of discussion here, I'll
> > > mention the new Ubuntu Mono font, which can be downloaded from
> > >http://font.ubuntu.com/
>
> > > The recent 0.80 release of the Ubuntu Fonts includes Ubuntu Mono in
> > > Regular, Regular Italic, Bold, and Bold Italic variants. It's the
> > > default font for the Terminal in next week's release of Oneiric
> > > Ocelot, Ubuntu 11.10. I've tried it in MacVim and Gnome Gvim and it
> > > looks decent. As the version number implies, the fonts (particularly
> > > Mono) are a work in progress.
>
> > In terminal they look really bad)
>
> Some, including me, like Ubuntu Mono in Terminal.
>
> > Looks more like famous Comic Sans=)
>
> Apparently, Ubuntu Mono is being tweaked (but not designed) by Vincent
> Connare, the designer of Comic 
> Sans:http://design.canonical.com/2011/09/ubuntu-monospace-beta/. He also
> designed Trebuchet, which is a much more respectable font.
>
> > Letter "M" - why did they do it?!
>
> That's been controversial. See the above link for some background.
> Also,https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+bug/869961
>
> > My choise for terminal is Liberation Mono.
>
> --
> /George V. Reilly  [email protected]  Twitter: 
> @georgevreillyhttp://www.georgevreilly.com/blog  http://blogs.cozi.com/tech

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Reply via email to