Hi again,
I tracked the error: it is happening because of the vimspell plugin.
When I deactivate it (let loaded_vimspell = 1), everything is back to
normal.
How should I proceed? Should I contact the vimspell developer?
Thanks a lot!
PS: I was writing an answer with some more info before I found the
problem, I post it here anyway.
Ben: Yes, it must be due to the plugins (i.e. it works fine with "-N -u
NONE -i NONE").
It happens with all buffers.
Tim:
vim 7.3, included patches 1-154 (should this be reported as 7.3.154?).
Running on Ubuntu 11.10 64 bit.
Error happens both on gvim and vi.
The final file has as weird characters *only* the ones added with ".".
The xxd experiment confirms, ie, normal blanks are "20" and the weird
characters as "62c2".
On Thu 17 Nov 2011 05:14:06 PM EET, Tim Chase wrote:
On 11/17/11 07:50, Ben Fritz wrote:
On Nov 17, 3:56 am, Sergio Losilla<[email protected]>
wrote:
A while ago, I noticed that when I use "." to repeat an
insert, the spaces get replaced by not signs (
,¬,¬). For instance, the following sequence of
keystrokes: "aa b c<ESC>." produces the following text: "a b
ca b c".
I checked that the characters are actually those (they are
saved to file), not just a visual representation of spaces.
I looked at the ". register, and the weird characters were
already there.
What version of Vim are you running? Any plugins you know may
affect the '.' command? Does it happen also when running Vim
without your plugins or mapping, e.g. "gvim -N -u NONE -i
NONE"? All buffers, or only buffers with a certain filetype?
Included in the "what version of Vim", it would be helpful not only to
have the version number ("7.2.123"), but how you're running it and the
platform: Win32 vs. Linux/Mac/BSD, gvim vs. console vim.
Also, when you say that the final file has the weird characters, is it
*all* the spaces, or just the ones added with "."? It might also be
helpful to epeat your experiment of "aa b c<esc>." then pipe your
contents through xxd to see what gets written where:
:%! xxd
which should change your buffer contents to something like
0000000: 6120 6220 6361 ac62 ac63 0a a b ca.b.c.
or
0000000: 61ac 62ac 6361 ac62 ac63 0a a.b.ca.b.c.
I agree with Ben that this is highly non-standard behavior.
-tim
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
