On Jan 21, 11:19 am, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > Egmont Koblinger wrote: > > I think all your technical questions are answered in the first comment of > >http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/2662-- please see that, and of > > course feel free to ask if you have any more questions. > > Thanks, that helps. However, it appears that the "second new extension" > is not actually supported by xterm yet. Did Thomas Dickey say something > about this?
yes - in discussing this with Egmont a few months ago, I pointed out some technical deficiencies with the 1015 code, and also noted a problem with urvt's implementation of 1005 (if the locale encoding isn't UTF-8, it won't report positions past 50x95). I followed up by implementing a 1006 which lacks the defects that I noted in urxvt's design. Those points are summarized in the change-log for #277, as well as in ctlseqs. http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.log.html#xterm_277 http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html (Actually I made these changes at the beginning of December, but other work got in the way of a more rapid update- hence the late release for vttest to demonstrate the feature). -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
