On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:45 -0500, Steve Hall wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Reid Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> These are ancient. Is there any reason the standard current Fedora > releases wouldn't work? > > http://mirrors.servercentral.net/fedora/releases/16/Everything/i386/os/Packages/ > > Packages: > > vim-X11-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm > vim-clustershell-1.5.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm > vim-common-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm > vim-enhanced-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm > vim-filesystem-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm > vim-latex-1.8.23-2.20101027.r1112.fc15.noarch.rpm > vim-latex-doc-1.8.23-2.20101027.r1112.fc15.noarch.rpm > vim-minimal-7.3.315-1.fc16.i686.rpm > vim-perl-support-4.13-2.fc16.noarch.rpm > vim-perl-tt2-0.1.3-3.fc15.noarch.rpm > vim-vimoutliner-0.3.4-14.fc15.noarch.rpm > > Still not the most current, but 7.3.315 is years newer than 7.0.109. > > -- > Steve Hall [ digitect dancingpaper com ] > potentially it could not work due to missing newer dependencies. Has current fedora switched to gtk3 yet? Are they using the same version of libc? etc -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
