The contents (image pixels) of 921798641_e656ca83e8.jpg are exactly the same as on flickr (diff exit code 0).
http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/aplus/apocalypto/apocalypto3lg.jpg is the same the one found on vim.org However the image is also shown here: http://s980.photobucket.com/albums/ae283/leelator/?action=view¤t=apocalypto3lg.jpg&sort=ascending and this differs. diffing both image contents in gimp shows that the difference shown in the histogram has level from 0 to 25 and is very likely caused by jpeg compression because difference seems to be 0 in the white areas. Because I found an amazon and a flickr source having exactly the same image contents I think its unlikely that those two jpegs are compromised in some way. I'd still be interested in knowing what happened. I still have an old database dump (several month old) - so I can try comparing the database data (authorship etc) I've been talking about: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1476 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1670 Both were owned by: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BQEBBJgf-dEJ:www.vim.org/account/profile.php%3Fuser_id%3D9483+Lazarus+color+scheme+site:vim.org&cd=10&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de and both are the only scripts of this user (according to that page in google cache) note: its a sourceforge.net email address shown three (I CCd him, but his domain is gone). So I don't expect replies. Did more such crap (other user accounts?) happen. How did you find out about them? ZyX told me - I'm unsure how he got to know about them.? Marc Weber -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
