On 21 February 2012 16:35, Christian Brabandt <cbli...@256bit.org> wrote: > On Tue, February 21, 2012 17:27, Marc Weber wrote: >> Excerpts from Ben Fritz's message of Tue Feb 21 16:48:36 +0100 2012: >>> Why not a real wiki with real wiki syntax? Or why not just create >>> pages on the existing wikia.com wiki with prominent links from >>> vim.org? code.google.com also provides a wiki, IIRC. I don't see a >>> need to create something new. >> Because its you who can download it and use it as local resource. >> That in turn could make people contribute little bit more because >> *editing in vim* is that easy :) >> >> And no, I'm not talking about reinventing the wheel, >> it does already exist: >> >> solution 1: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/gitit >> solution 2: Vim help file syntax >> solution 3: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2226 >> >> Why not mediawiki? Because sending patches requires "logging in" >> Because you can't use Vim for editing (I know that there are plugins >> which come close - but - we just *love* Vim, don't we?) > > There used to be a fused based filesystem, that allows to > edit mediawiki sites like local files. I don't know how well this works, > it used to work very well several years ago, but I haven't used it in > years and wikipediafs seems unmaintained currently.
It's also unlikely to work for all those unfortunate Windows users! Al -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
