Hi Tim!
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:02:21 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
On 02/28/12 05:41, [email protected] wrote:
[..]
There are two possibilities that occur to me. The first is if you
want the *whole* line underlined. There are lots of ways you can do
this. I personally use
:t.|s/./-/g
Sounds good.
(which could be wrapped up in a macro) because it doesn't tromp my
scratch register. I know other people use a macro that does
something
like
YpVr-
to "Y"ank the current line, "p"aste it, "V"isualize the line, and
"r"eplace each character in that selection with a "-". Note that
changes your scratch/yank registers' contents.
Thats so easy if I see it now! Thanks!
You can map them something like
:nnoremap <leader>- :t.<bar>s/./-/g<cr>
:nnoremap <leader>= YpVr=
so you can (by default, based on your 'mapleader' setting) type
\=
to underline the current line with "="s. I put in both styles so you
can see how each would work, but I'd pick the one that's clearest to
you and stick with it for both cases.
Ok, thanks.
I modified the command to "Ypwv$r=", so ich moved to the next "word"
(let the comment marker alive), then marked with standard marker v (not
V for whole line) up to the end ("$"), then replacing it :-)
The other case regards visually marking a sub-portion of a line as
underlined such as
I only want this part underlined, okay?
--------------------
That's a lot harder, so if it's what you want, time can be taken to
cook up something, but there are some non-trivial edge-cases that
would have to be addressed.
Thats not necessary. For Markdown-Syntax the example above is full
functionally.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Oliver
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
