On Mar 2, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Chris Lott wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My reason for being interested in mmd is {1] I'm not a programmer, [2] I >> compose in and manage larger writing projects with Scrivener, which provides >> for export to latex via mmd, [3] I'm primarily interested in being able to >> use latex to format and print/publish short documents composed in vim. > > I wonder if there isn't some kind of misunderstanding? You can use > vim-pandoc with markdown or multimarkdown. Which means you can use > Markdown and generate the print version using the pandoc program to > create LaTeX or HTML or just to clean up and normalize your > markdown/multimarkdown code. Pandoc as a markup adds some things to > the markdown/multimarkdown base, but the engine seems to have > everything I have thrown at it from md/mmd.
Thanks, Chris. I've learned a bit about pandoc since writing that. Intrigued, both for the extended markdown and document conversion capabilities. Since I manage larger writing projects in Scrivener, which provides direct export to latex via mmd, pandoc and the vimpandoc plugin strike me a bit as overkill for the simple smaller documents I'd like to format with latex. I just might adopt it anyway. Regards. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA [email protected] "A man should be in the world as though he were not in it so that it will be no worse because of his life." - Wendell Berry -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
