On Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:32:53 PM UTC-5, rockybalboa4 wrote: > Is there any rationale behind the fact that > > dg_ > > yields different results than > > d:normal! g_ > > ? The latter does not reach the last character on the line. Is it documented? > Shouldn't it be documented? Is it a bug?
I don't know if it's a bug, or if it's documented somewhere, but it looks like d:normal! g_ is acting in an "exclusive" fashion, even though g_ is normally "inclusive". With that in mind, this DOES work (for me anyway): dv:normal! g_ See :help o_v -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
