On 07/16/12 14:27, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Bram, > > On Sa, 07 Jul 2012, Tim Chase wrote: >> Two parts of me conflict on this: one thinks "wow, that's a cool >> idea", the other thinks "what twisted sicko thought up that one?!" > > Attached patch search_textobj.diff implements a match text-object. This > was just a fun way to, to see if this is possible.
I haven't given it a whirl yet, but this sounds like something I'd have found useful on more than one occasion. Thanks! > BTW: This here looks suspicious: > > #define RE_SEARCH 0 /* save/use pat in/from search_pattern */ > #define RE_SUBST 1 /* save/use pat in/from subst_pattern */ > #define RE_BOTH 2 /* save pat in both patterns */ > #define RE_LAST 2 /* use last used pattern if "pat" is NULL */ Could you clarify your suspicion? From just the short excerpt you provide, this sounds a bit like :help last-pattern where I found some frustration[1] and you again chimed in with a patch (thanks again!) -tim [1] http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Two-search-patterns-td3353999.html -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
