On Aug 4, 2012 3:43 PM, "Daan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's entirely up to you of course! I use 's' a lot (particular in the > > form of e.g. 3s to change three letters). It has the (significant in > > my book) advantage over 3xi that if I then use '.' to repeat, it > > repeats the change, not just the insertion. [...] > > s is functionally the same as cl, so you would still be able to perform your command (as 3cl or c3l), albeit at the cost of 1 more keypress than with s. > > I understand s is useful, but what I want to find out is whether you advanced vimmers think the benefits of saving the keypress for <shift>4 would outweigh the disadvantages of having to do cl instead of s. > > > If you find $ hard to get to, you could always map most > > of your suggested benefit specifically, e.g. > > > > nmap <Leader>p $p > > That's a good point, although it would only work for $p. Don't you think that all the other things you could more easily do, such as [count]$, si, sF and so on be worth it?
Personally, no, but then I use s on a daily basis. To each their own like I said. Al > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
