I'm still no quite clear. So when I set shiftround it moves the code by the length of shiftwidth-1 when I use the >> or << ?
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Marcin Szamotulski <[email protected]>wrote: > On 05:44 Sat 17 Nov , cyboman wrote: > > I'm reading an online book, Learning Vim the hardway, and it talks about > the shiftround option. I tried it but it didn't affect anything. The effect > was the same as before. I tried reading the help but it wasn't very helpful > :) Has anybody used this option before? What is the advantage of it? What > am I doing wrong that I don't see its effects? > > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > > -- > > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > With noshiftround the >> on the line > x > leads to > x > when the shiftround is on > x > As you can see it is one column before. > > Best, > Marcin > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
