Daniel P. Wright (12月12日（水）) >> > Hello, > > short version>>> > > When using inoremap <expr>, does vim throw away some part of state that > is kept when using a normal inoremap? Calling an <expr> function which > returns <C-x><C-n> results in different behaviour to doing a plain > inoremap to <C-x><C-n>. >
I think I must have been tired yesterday. Today I made a simpler test case literally comparing a plain inoremap to <C-x><C-n> with an <expr> map calling a function which returns it, and found that actually they're exactly the same, so what I've written above is wrong. The real problem was that <C-x><C-n> is the wrong sequence of keystrokes to select the next item in the menu! The correct sequence is of course just <C-n>. Apologies for the noise! -Dani. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
