On 2012–12–22 Marc Weber wrote: > So what made you switch? If there are good reasons to prefer Vundle I'd > like to add those to VAM's documentation so that users find it easier to > use the best tool for teir job.
There was nothing particularly wrong with VAM which made me switch. I changed other plugins as well. Having used both VAM and Vundle I can conclude that both work fine for me. VAM has more features, Vundle takes a more simplistic approach. One thing I like about Vundle is how easy it is to add a plugin hosted on github. With VAM I sometimes struggled to find the correct script name to provide for the ActivateAddons call. But maybe that's just me. > Don't you miss features such as > - loading plugins at runtime which allows to load plugins only > when editing specific filetypes? Frankly speaking, no. I never used it. > If you have had trouble with anything let us know so that we have a > chance to fix it. I really appreciate the concerns to improve VAM. As I said there was nothing wrong with it which made me switch. Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
