Cool plugin, thanks for sharing.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Jeroen Budts <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/25/2013 09:29 PM, Marco wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I like navigating the jump list using ctrl-o and ctrl-i. The problem > > is that I also prefer to use relativenumber. Both settings, > > unfortunately, do not match very well. > > > > If I have relativenumber set, I navigate to the visible text parts > > using e.g. 15k or 22j. However, these jumps are not recorded in the > > jump list. This basically means using relativenumber entirely > > invalidates the usefulness of the jump list. > > > > If I use number instead of relativenumber, navigation by line > > numbers gets really painful. I then navigate using e.g. > > 12843gg or 1937gg > > > > As a consequence I either use the search (/, ?) instead of direct > > jumps or the change list (g;, g,). But I feel that both are sort-of > > unpredictable and not suitable in all cases or even slower compared > > to e.g. 15k. > > > > Any suggestions about how to improve my workflow or even a solution > > for relativenumber and the jump list to be friends? Maybe there is a > > setting which adds j and k jumps which are preceded by a count to > > the jump list. > > > > Marco > > > Marco, > > A few weeks ago I had *exactly* the same feeling. For this reason I > wrote the small plugin named 'jk-jumps', which is available here: > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4395. (it's probably one > of the smallest plugins available :)). > It basically changes the j and k keys to act as usual, but make Vim > recognize those movements as a jump if you jump more than the > configurable amount of lines. It took me a few releases to get it > correctly right (regarding folds etc) but with version 0.4 it seems to > work without any problems now. > > Feel free to comment, suggest features etc on github: > https://github.com/teranex/jk-jumps.vim. > > I already suspected that I wouldn't be the only one with this idea, so > this makes me wonder again: wouldn't it be possible/useful to add this > to Vim itself as an option? > > Jeroen > > -- > website: http://budts.be/ - twitter: @teranex > ___________________________________ > Registered Linux User #482240 - GetFirefox.com - ubuntu.com > > > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > > > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
