On Jan 28, 4:02 pm, Ben Fritz <[email protected]> wrote: > ...my Windows XP 64-bit machine, running 7.3.762 gvim > > gvim -N -u NONE -i NONE -U NONE > :runtime plugin/tohtml.vim > (...enter some text...) > :colorscheme default > :TOhtml > > For me, this gives black text on a white background.
<...snip...> >> However, the closed folds >> and the text showing in the closed folds are the right color. Has >> anyone else experienced this on Windows 7 (64-bit)? >> Interestingly enough, gvim compiled for Cygwin and its X11 renders >> to HTML using the proper colours. I provide the version info for >> both Windows & Cygwin/X11 versions below. >> >> Windows version: >> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Oct 27 2010 17:59:02) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> MS-Windows 32-bit GUI version with OLE support >> Included patches: 1-46 >> [Snip] >> ================================================================== >> Cygwin/X11 version: >> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Aug 31 2012 02:25:38) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Included patches: 1-646 >> [Snip] >> ================================================================== > > It looks like your cygwin Vim is much more recent, and your TOhtml > plugin is therefore probably also much more recent. > > Can you try installing a more recent native Vim to see what happens? > If this does not work or is not an option, can you post a file as > example output of the script? > > There are multiple ways to get an up-to-date Vim on Windows, my > preferred method being the 32-bit "Vim without Cream" installer from > the Cream project. > See > http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Where_to_download_Vimorhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/cream/files That *is* odd. I could have sworn that I downloaded the built-in executable installer of the Windows from vim.org in fall 2012. I actually tried your virgin gvim command and it did not create erroneous HTML colors. I then tried gvim without the virgin swithes (I know, I'm probably abusing the term "virgin") and failed to re- create the problem. I even turned on folds and turned on search highlighting in case that was the case. Still no erroneous colours. It looks like I saved myself tons of debugging time. Thanks! -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
