Hi! On Fri, 01 Mar 2013, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 26.02.13 20:11, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > Also, urxvt can be compiled to be very, very small, which > > some people prefer for whatever reason. > > Now that can be good to know. (I went for Debian with LXDE on > my laptop, to speed up booting, for example.)
The thing about urxvt in this regard is mostly modularity. In the configure phase, you can remove a _lot_ of stuff. Here's a comparison to rxvt from the FAQ: http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.pod#Isn_t_rxvt_unicode_supposed_to_be_sm That said, I don't agree with all of the author's notions of "what a terminal needs". Then again, I can get what I want out of it, so I'm a happy camper. Regards, Tobias -- printk("Illegal format on cdrom. Pester manufacturer.\n"); linux-2.2.16/fs/isofs/inode.c -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
