Hi On Fr, 12 Apr 2013, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello Christian, > > Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> a écrit: > > Hi zappathustra! > > (Actually, it should be ``Paul Isambert'' as usual, but for the moment > I'm stuck with the Google interface, and I'm registered with my email > address only.) Sorry, that is being added by mutt automatically and I usually don't check it, because it usually just works ;) > > > On Fr, 12 Apr 2013, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Marco <[email protected]> a écrit: > > > > On 2013–04–12 Ben Fritz wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's not configurable. > > > > > > > > > > { and } strictly use paragraph boundaries, defined as empty lines > > > > > or lines using nroff macros specified in the 'paragraphs' option. > > > > > > > > > > ip uses these but also has an exception for lines containing > > > > > nothing but whitespace. > > > > > > > > > > See :help paragraph and :help ip > > > > > > > > I did read those sections. The 'paragraphs' option with the default > > > > setting "IPLPPPQPP TPHPLIPpLpItpplpipbp" is one of the weirdest vim > > > > options I encountered in a while. Why is it restricted to nroff > > > > macros? It could better take a regex or anything more general than > > > > nroff macros. > > > > > > > > > This behavior annoys me too but it is what it is. > > > > > > > > Good to hear that it's not just me. If there is interest, maybe a > > > > second variable, e.g. 'paragraphsregex' could be implemented and set > > > > to an arbitrary regex as paragraph delimiter. If it's undefined, the > > > > old behaviour takes precedence to remain backwards compatible. > > > > > > That behavior annoys a lot of people; it's even #46 in the wish list: > > > http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php > > > > Some time ago¹, I made a patch. Please test. Here is the updated patch > > again (which I seemed to have forgotten to attach in a later message). > > > > ¹) https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/6r6qX8W6I_Y/pQPexgLWI6UJ > > Ah, nice! (I remember that issue had come up recently.) > > I've applied the patch and it's quite good; too bad I'm quite lame > with building Vim myself (I've only recently succeeded in building > the GUI...) and I prefer to use the Debian package. I'll have to wait > until the patch is official! > > Anyway I've already found two buglets :) (unless your patch was just a > proof of concept): first, branches won't work: > > set paragraphs=/^\s*$\|whatever The patch in fact was just a proof of concept. But if there is interest, I can work on it further. Please let me know any problems you found and the settings of the paragraphs/section setting. > doesn't find anything; second (but that's actually inherited from the > original option), it'd be nice if the option were global-local. That indeed is a nice extension. I can change this as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian -- F: Was hat vier Beine und kann fliegen? A: Zwei Vögel -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
